While wandering around the Internet looking for that pleasant little visual, I stumbled across this fun, headline:
. . . the best way to prevent death by Daylight Saving Time may be to make it permanent, according to Standard Time abolitionists.
Death by Daylight Saving Time?
You heard (read?) right. Yes. Portlanders are on a roll. This quote from The Oregonian, March 9, 2015, in an article by Joseph Rose entitled: 5 reasons why Daylight Saving Time week is dangerous for Portland area commuters gives the gist:
Advocates of perpetual DST have some statistics on their side. Adding an hour of sunlight in the evening year-round would save the lives of more than 170 pedestrians annually, according to a 2004 study in Accident Analysis and Prevention. The lives of nearly 200 vehicle occupants would also theoretically be saved by the change.
“Here’s that short quiz I keep using.”
Ever since my Peace Corps years in Kazakhstan (2004-2006) when President Nursultan Nazarbayev did away with DST in his country with just a flick of his pen, I’ve been wondering why America doesn’t do the same thing.
Actually, because we live in a democracy — and one whose lawmakers rely on special interest groups for their information (and their money; sorry, I digress) — it’s not so easy to just do away with it. As we all know by now, democracy is not very efficient. I’m not knocking it, mind you. Just saying …
So, given we’ve got special interests lined up advocating for their interests, I wondered who would these special interests be lining up to defend Daylight Saving Time? Who benefits from changing the clocks an hour twice a year? For it’s certainly not me. Or you, I imagine.
Before today’s post, I assumed it would be the farmers. I can still remember one of my high school teachers telling us that DST would enable farmers to have a longer time for their harvest. And, given that the U.S. extended DST during the energy crisis of 1973-74 (I remember that too), I thought probably DST saves energy. I also figured it must be popular among the majority for it to still be around.
Back in 2013, when I first began these DST rants, I turned to the Internet for verification. And I found out I was wrong on all counts.
My first stop was an article from National Geographic magazine of November 3, 2013 from which I learned the following
- DST saves us neither money nor energy. First begun during WWI as energy saving measure, today, in “any place that has air conditioning, … daylight saving is a loser.”
- Fewer than 40% of Americans surveyed think DST is worth the hassle.
- Arizona—except for residents of the Navajo Nation—Hawaii, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, American Samoa, Guam, and the Northern Marianas Islands ignore DST.
- Over the past 50 years, DST has been stretched from six months to seven months to now eight months in part because several industries have been huge supporters.
- Economics have always played a role in the politics of daylight saving time. In the mid-1980s, for example, the golf industry estimated that an extra month of DST was worth $200 to $400 million.
Golf? How many Americans play golf? What other industries benefit, I wondered. Then read:
During that same time (one extra month of DST), the U.S. barbecue industry pegged their increased profits at $150 million for that same additional month. [sic]
That figures. More time for barbeques.
- Daylight saving reliably increases the amount of driving that Americans do, and gasoline consumption tracks up with daylight saving.
- Oil and auto industries have always been big supporters of DST.
These are all quotes from the article. I didn’t make any of this up. Honest.
So, that’s who is lined up advocating for DST: golfers, barbequers, and the oil and auto industries.
There’s an organized opposition to Daylight Savings Time too.
Not nearly as well-heeled as the pro-siders, but it turns out the farmers want an end to this biannual clock change, particularly the dairy farmers. Seems their cows are a bit put out with the time change.
Quite a few religious groups (particularly orthodox ones) whose prayer schedule is also based on the sun not the clock wish it would go away.
Teachers (officially, the PTA, so maybe it’s more the parents) want to see an end.
The TV industry is opposed to DST. The most popular shows, according to the Nielsen ratings, go down by 10 – 15 percent in viewership during the first week of DST. I imagine they wouldn’t care if we did DST all year or not, just so we didn’t touch the clock.
The Obama White House tried to do away with it too, but failed to get the required number of signatures. Too bad I didn’t hear of it. I’d have gone door to door!
Researchers at the University of Utah came up with an impressive economic downside from Daylight Saving Time.
the simple but inconvenient act of changing America’s clocks and devices back and forth represents an annual $1.7 billion of lost opportunity cost. This was based on the average American’s hourly wage and an assumption that each person spent some ten minutes changing clocks, watches, and other devices—time that could have been far more productively spent.
Then there’s the medical piece.
Turns out there’s a 10% increase in the number of heart attacks in the few days following DST’s start in the spring. Fortunately, I hasten to add, there’s a 10% decrease in them once it’s over in the fall.
So, with evidence against DST mounting, I pick up the mantle. But, what can I, one lonely individual, do? Turns out there’s an organization dedicated to ending DST. It’s called
Check them out, if you want to join my merry little band of
So, how about you? What’s your stand on Daylight Saving Time?
NEXT WEEK: Another look back 50 years. What will we see?